Skip to content
Connect with us
[the_ad_placement id="manual-placement"] [the_ad_placement id="obituaries"]

Bennington, VT News

Vermont Supreme Court Green Mountain Power Ruling Upholds Landowner Trespass Precedent

The Vermont Supreme Court unanimously upheld landowner trespass protections, ruling Green Mountain Power is not liable for injuries to a child who entered a locked Springfield electrical substation. Justices declined to adopt the attractive nuisance doctrine.

Published

on

Fenced electrical substation at dusk with warning signs — Vermont Supreme Court Green Mountain Power ruling

Last updated:

BENNINGTON, Vt. NewsWK By Randy Breland, Editor— The Vermont Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision upholding long-standing property liability protections for landowners, ruling that Green Mountain Power (GMP) cannot be held liable for injuries sustained by a child who trespassed into a locked utility substation.

The state’s highest court affirmed a previous Windsor County Superior Court summary judgment that threw out a negligence lawsuit against the utility company.

The decision stems from a severe and tragic incident occurring more than a decade ago in May 2013. The plaintiff, Ian Treadway, who was 12 years old at the time, was playing with two friends near the South Street electrical substation in Springfield, Vermont. According to court documents, Treadway entered the substation and either came into direct contact with electrified infrastructure or got close enough for a high-voltage electrical current to arc to his body, causing severe burns.

Green Mountain Power Substation Lawsuit Focuses on Landowner Liability

Justices Decline to Adopt Vermont Attractive Nuisance Doctrine

Attorneys for Treadway argued that the state should adopt the “attractive nuisance” doctrine. The legal doctrine, recognized in many other states, creates a liability exception for children by imposing a duty of care on landowners if a dangerous, artificial condition on the property is likely to attract young trespassers who may not fully grasp the safety risks.

However, writing for the unanimous court, Justice Harold Eaton Jr. stated that the justices declined to overrule Vermont’s established common law, which generally dictates that property owners owe no legal duty of safety to trespassers beyond avoiding intentional or reckless harm.

“We decline to overrule our existing cases,” Justice Eaton wrote, preserving the traditional framework of Vermont landowner liability.

Substation Security Measures Cited in Green Mountain Power Court Decision

The high court emphasized that Green Mountain Power had taken significant, visible precautions to secure the dangerous site and warn the public to stay away.

Court records detailed that the South Street substation was fully enclosed by a chain-link fence topped with vertical barbed wire, standing over eight feet tall. The perimeter was also clearly marked with six separate warning signs reading “DANGER” and “HIGH VOLTAGE KEEP OUT.” Additionally, the operational equipment produced a distinct, audible electrical hum.

“Despite the indications that this infrastructure was built with the intent to keep people out and the visible and legible warning signs to that effect, plaintiff entered the substation,” the court’s decision noted.

While the exact method of entry remained partially disputed—with conflicting recollections over whether Treadway squeezed between locked gates or used a gate latch as a foothold to scale the upper boundary—both parties ultimately agreed that entry occurred past the padlocked security perimeter.

Witness statements from the case file also revealed that Treadway’s friends had warned him right before the accident, with one stating they were walking away and telling him, “I’m going to laugh at you when you get electrocuted,” moments before hearing a loud bang and seeing smoke.

By maintaining current precedent, the Vermont Supreme Court’s ruling reinforces legal protections for utilities and private property owners statewide who fully secure their hazardous properties and install compliant safety barriers.

This report covers public legal and court filings out of Montpelier and Windsor County. For more regional updates across Southern Vermont, keep refreshing bennington.newswk.com.

Related: Bennington Battle Day Marked as Historic Monument Awaits Repairs

Related: Bennington 250 Announces ‘250 for 250’ Year-End Gala to Support Anniversary Celebrations

Related: Warm, Cloudier Pattern Sets In for Bennington County Before Weekend Drizzle and Cooler Air

Related: Damp Late-August Stretch Brings Rain, Drizzle, and Cooler Temperatures to Bennington County

Related: Border County Tax Pressures Mount as New York Shifts SNAP Costs

Related: Smithsonian Partners With Bennington Groups for Cultural Initiative

See a typo? Report it here.

Privacy Policy
Developed and Maintained by Land Tech Web Designs, Corp
Copyright © 2026 Newswk.com

Bennington News Weekly provides independent local news, weather updates, and community event coverage for Bennington, VT, and surrounding Southwestern Vermont communities.

How to Get Involved

  • Stay Connected Locally: For real-time breaking news alerts and community updates throughout the week, keep your browser locked right here to Bennington News Weekly.
  • Gulf Coast Updates: Looking for news from the South? Check out our sister site at Pensacola News Daily for the latest developments in Northwest Florida and the Gulf Coast.
  • National and Global Headlines: For comprehensive national coverage, breaking political analysis, and world news, visit our main hub at Newsweek Digital.